Posts Tagged ‘Central Banks’

Gold 'Panic' Buying Ends, Reducing Austrian Coin Sales by 80% – BusinessWeek

Saturday, March 20th, 2010

Wall Street Pit (blog)
Gold 'Panic' Buying Ends, Reducing Austrian Coin Sales by 80%
BusinessWeek
Muenze Oesterreich minted a record 1.04 million ounces of gold coins in 2009, including 903047 of its top-selling 1-ounce Philharmonic coins.
Gold Role Reversal: Central Banks Now Net Gold BuyersDaily Reckoning (press release)

all 5 news articles »

Source:Gold 'Panic' Buying Ends, Reducing Austrian Coin Sales by 80% – BusinessWeek

"He Who Has the Gold…"

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Emerging-market nations hoarded new gold reserves at a near-record pace in 2009…

SEEING WASHINGTON’S belligerence over how Beijing pegs the price of its Yuan, three unsettling facts are buried amongst the latest central-bank gold data compiled by the World Gold Council

  • Central banks worldwide grew their physical gold reserves at the fastest pace since 1965 in 2009, adding bullion for the first time in two decades as a group;
  • Emerging economies added a near-record volume of metal to their official reserves, putting more than 21% of all the gold held by sovereign states outside the control of developed-world OECD members;
  • Western central banks, in contrast, shrank their reserves by more than 1% last year. Since the end of 2004, they have sold almost twice-as-much gold as non-OECD members have acquired (1881 vs. 994 tonnes).

As the gold-bug’s Golden Rule says, "He who has the gold makes the rules" – an historic fact proven by the United States’ own dominance of world finance and politics since the end of WWII.

And now that Congress is threatening trade sanctions against China for under-valuing its currency, the Yuan, Washington might want to take note of how its Dollar came to be the world’s No.1 currency.

Last year marked a "changing pattern" says the World Gold Council, pointing to slower West European sales and "accelerating" purchases by emerging-economy states.

But even noting Moscow’s frantic expansion of its gold reserves – primarily bought from domestic mine output, and taking Russia to 9th position in the sovereign league table – the WGC’s comments underplay the deeper, political shift of monetary intent, if not power.

In full-year 2009, emerging-economy states grew their reported reserves by 17.8%, adding 868 tonnes of bullion to build a new record hoard of 5738 tonnes. Yes, China’s announcement in April that it had added 454 tonnes to its reserves over the previous six years accounted for a big chunk of that move. But Beijing and the Kremlin weren’t alone in Buying Gold. By the end of 2009, non-OECD members held half-as-much gold again as they did on average over the previous six decades.

Trying to force fresh Dollar-devaluation on today’s Treasury bond holders is only likely to spur this underlying trend still further.

Ready to Buy  Gold…?

Source:"He Who Has the Gold…"

China Buying Gold…and Silver?

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Is the People’s Bank of China Buying Gold for itself and silver for its citizens…?

IN THE LAST MONTH’S
U.S. Treasury report, it was announced that China had sold $34.2 billion of Washington’s debt in December – or allowed short-term bonds to run off – making Japan once again the largest holder of US Treasuries, writes Martin Hutchinson for Money Morning.

That battle between China and Japan is not very interesting. But the question of where China is opting to invest instead certainly is.

After all, $34.2 billion is a fair chunk of change, and China’s overall reserves are growing – not shrinking – now totaling $2.4 trillion.

The People’s Bank of China usually keeps its holdings a carefully guarded secret, much more so than for most central banks. Our knowledge of its holdings of Treasuries comes from US data, not from China.  We do, however, have some evidence about the Chinese government’s investment thinking, thanks to the holdings of China Investment Corp., the country’s $200 billion sovereign wealth fund.

CIC got heavily involved in the U.S. financial business in 2007, buying a $3 billion stake in the Blackstone Group (NYSE: BX) and a $5 billion stake in Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) – in both cases, 9.9% of the outstanding common stock. Neither of those investments turned out particularly well, however. Blackstone is down about 60% from CIC’s buy price while Morgan Stanley is down about 40%.

More recently, CIC has turned toward natural resources, in 2009 buying 17% of Teck Resources Ltd. (NYSE: TCK) and 13% of Singapore-based Noble Group. Teck Resources is a major diversified mining company, while Noble is a global commodities trading/supply-chain manager with $36 billion in sales.

For CIC, the bad news is that because commodities companies have wimpy market valuations compared with the overstuffed titans of Wall Street, its investments in Teck and Noble were much smaller – some $1.7 billion and $1.1 billion respectively. Still, those investments have turned out a lot better. CIC’s Teck investment is worth about 110% more than it cost and its Noble investment has risen about 60%, with both increases coming in less than a year.

So which do you think the Chinese government is motivated to invest in – the staggering titans of US financial services…or rapidly growing commodity producers? That’s without taking into consideration the fact that China has an ever-increasing thirst for commodities, because of its rapid growth, whereas it has perfectly competent banks of its own.

Let’s not get carried away. The People’s Bank of China is a central bank, not a sovereign wealth fund, and it couldn’t invest $2.4 trillion in Teck Resources shares if it wanted to (though the other Teck shareholders would doubtless enjoy the ride if it wanted to try!).

Still, look at the alternatives:

  • The People’s Bank could buy more Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) bonds. However, those are effectively guaranteed by the U.S. government and are subject to the risk of U.S. inflation and rising rates. Probably not;
  • It could buy Euro bonds and bills. It already has a fair chunk of these, and probably doesn’t want to increase its exposure while it’s still not clear what will happen to Greece. One possible solution to the Greek problem would be Bernanke-esque money printing by the European Central Bank (ECB), which would zap the value of Euro bonds; alternatively, if no solution was found, further countries could follow Greece into default;
  • It could buy British gilts. If it doesn’t like the US risks, it will really hate the British ones, which are the same, but worse;
  • It could buy Japan government bonds. With Japan running deflation at 2%-3%, the 2% yield on 10-year JGB represents a real yield of 4%-5%. So if you think Japan will sort itself out before defaulting, this is about the best deal in the market. But China is not big buddies with Japan;
  • It could buy Australian, Canadian or Swiss government bonds. All three are good deals in sound economies, but deploying $34.2 billion into any of them within a month is probably impossible.

So given that central banks don’t generally buy stocks (that’s what sovereign wealth funds are for), or dabble in commodity futures, there are really only two decent alternatives into which China could sink that amount of money: Gold and silver.

China already owns some Gold Bullion, but not much, compared to the size of its reserves – 1,054 tons at March 2009, worth about $37 billion at today’s prices.

At 1.5% of its reserves, that’s pathetic, though it’s up 76% since 2003. On average, international central banks hold 10.2% of their reserves in gold. To get to that level, China would have to buy more than $200 billion worth – about two years’ global mine output.

Nevertheless, it seems unlikely that China will be willing to retain above average confidence in the eternal value of Western fiat currencies, and so it’s probable that considerable Chinese gold buying is taking place on a confidential basis.

Silver is not is a significant part of most countries’ reserves, but China is historically an exception, since in Imperial times it was on a silver standard rather a Gold Standard, and so retained substantial reserves. Early in the 2000s it was a major seller, selling 50 million ounces in each of 2001 and 2002, at the then-prevailing prices of below $5 an ounce. After that it stopped selling.

Then, in September 2009, the Chinese government passed a decree encouraging Chinese savers to buy silver, issuing publicity explaining that buying silver was a good deal since the Gold/Silver Ratio at 70-to-1 was historically very high, offering them convenient small-value ingots with which to buy it, and prohibiting the export of silver from China.

This was almost certainly a move designed to dampen stock-market speculation and reduce money supply growth, since bank deposits converted into silver would effectively be sterilized. What’s more, if the long-awaited Chinese banking crisis ever happened, the effect on the long-suffering Chinese public would be mitigated if people held substantial wealth in the form of readily negotiable silver ingots.

In any case, it’s likely that China as a whole – whether the government or its people – is now a very substantial buyer of silver, indeed, possibly to a greater extent than gold. Thus, a rundown in People’s Bank of China holdings of US Treasuries could be readily accounted for by purchases of gold for its own account and of silver to supply to the Chinese public.

China is not a universal fount of investment wisdom. But with this information, I know which way I’m betting.

Looking to Buy Gold and silver for your personal reserves today? Make it simple, secure and low-cost by using BullionVault

Source:China Buying Gold…and Silver?

1931 for the Euro, Part II

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Gold, Greece and the Euro currency’s "irreparable exchange rate"…

PRICING YOUR money in gold – in a world where everyone else did the same, and at fixed exchange rates, too – made for a big problem when the welfare state began gobbling up more wealth, year after year, than it could earn in taxation.

"No [social] safety nets were allowed," wrote Peter Bernstein of the Gold Standard in his Power of Gold (Wiley, 2001).

"If the gold stock was flowing outward [thanks to the currency falling on the international exchanges], interest rates had to rise to attract foreign funds and the domestic economy had to be suppressed to curtail imports."

Glued back together after the cataclysm of World War I put an end to cross-border capital flows, this informal yet tightly rule-bound system cracked and finally shattered for good when the 1930s saw world trade collapse in turn. But "even when countries went off gold," as Princeton professor Paul Krugman wrote in late 2009, "the prevailing mentality made them reluctant to cut [interest] rates."

Or rather, it made central banks reluctant to cut the cost of money below zero, as Krugman would advise. Because with the monthly in- and out-flow of Gold Bullion from the foreign exchanges for so long measuring the credit extended by foreign and domestic wealth, government policy naturally leant towards deflation.

Defending the value of cash, rather than inflating it away, gives creditors confidence. And that, paradoxically, is the only way to finance deficit spending long term.

The alternative, at least to the mind of 1931 policy-makers, was Germany’s 2.7 million per cent Weimar inflation of 10 years before. Whereas the solution, 10 years ago, was for higher-spending Euro nations to piggyback on Germany’s unparalleled credit rating with a single, pan-sovereign currency.

"Whether we returned to the Gold Standard [after WWI] too early or not is debatable, but it is no longer a matter of more than academic interest," wrote Edward Peacock, King George V’s own financial advisor, a director of Baring Bank, and a likely-looking successor as Bank of England governor, on 1st August.

"To go off the Gold Standard, for a nation that depends so much upon its credit, would be a major disaster."

Hence the deflationary measures – such as slashing the dole by ten if not twenty per cent – argued over in cabinet. Great Britain couldn’t support both its gold reserves and its growing state-spending commitments, a fact made livid by the apparent "bankers’ ramp" that bet against the Pound on one side, trying to force a cut in state wages…and the near-mutiny of a thousand Royal Navy sailors from the Atlantic fleet at Invergordon, Scotland on the other, after those wage cuts were imposed.

The news sent to the Admiralty on August 19th sparked a fresh run on the Pound, finally forcing the crisis in London. Something must give, and in a world of gold-fixed exchange rates, that something was Sterling – its gold backing, and thus its international exchange-rate value.

Great Britain, long "the conductor of the international orchestra" in John Maynard Keynes’ phrase, abdicated its role with the ultimate default five weeks later.

"Two lessons were taught by Invergordon and the withdrawal from the gold commitment," reckoned William Rees-Mogg, former editor of The Times and advisor to Margaret Thatcher, as the ugliest financial crisis since the Thirties hit the global exchanges in late 2009.

"Governments should not try to balance the budget by cutting the pay of essential public servants; and they should not defend at all costs an overvalued fixed exchange rate."

Athens today, of course, is a long way from balancing its budget, and it rarely tried to defend the pre-Euro Drachma, let alone at all costs. But did it enter the fixed currency union at too high an exchange rate…over-valuing its money and thus itself…thereby dooming Greece to a date with deflation, if not default, sooner or later?

Pricing yourself out of the market, and thus out of Gold Bullion, was what France (at first) avoided but Britain fell for when the pre-WWI Gold Standard was revived – only to gasp its last a decade later – in the mid-1920s. Thanks to what became known as the 1925 "Norman Conquest of $4.86" in honor of the Bank of England’s eccentric, neurotic and frankly unhinged governor, Montagu Norman, Sterling was priced at its 1914 valuation in terms of both gold and the Dollar. Whereas Paris, instead of nailing itself to some pre-war ideal of honor or virtue, watched the Franc lose two-thirds of its Dollar value, before cutting income tax and raising consumption levies in 1926, inviting a flood of French wealth back into its coffers.

"From a position of approximate equality with the gold reserve of the Bank of England in 1926, the Bank of France’s gold holdings were double [that] by 1929," writes Peter Bernstein in his Power of Gold. "Two years later, the French gold hoard would be approaching five times the size of Britain’s."

Hence Britain’s failure to devalue Sterling against bullion, rather than quit gold entirely, in Sept. 1931. It couldn’t risk a final flight from the Pound, sucking out what little remained of its hoard – a phantom that would haunt the US when it ran the world’s Gold Exchange system post-WWII (and only exorcised by Richard Nixon also "closing the Gold Window" four decades later). Not with France, the US, Russia and even post-Weimar Germany all hoarding ever-more gold in what proved a scramble for the ultimate money as Japan annexed Korea, Spain fell to Franco, and the Wehrmacht then marched into Prague.

Devaluation today – a policy so often used to rescue the short-term political and economic fortunes of what City analysts cannot now call the PIIGS – also remains shut to the Greeks, but for another reason entirely: Revaluation within the Euro is impossible.

Joining the European single currency, and consigning sovereign notes and coins to history, meant swapping those notes and coins for a certain, agreed quantity of Euros. Once set and enacted, that exchange rate could never again be revised. Because the exchange…once you were holding Euros…could never again be replayed.

"There is no wiggle room here," as two English academics – both smirking and gasping at the Eurozone strait jacket – wrote in a 2004 tome.

"Greece has to live with this conversion rate no matter what happens to its level of productivity or inflation relative to its Euroland partners, or its level of internal unemployment.

"If it becomes politically unacceptable to live with this rate, Greece has only one realistic option, and that is abandoning the Euro."


Hence the name – "irrevocable exchange rate"…although "irreparable" would seem a better name with hindsight, and after the domestic inflation which continued regardless.

Set 12 months in advance of each member state’s last sovereign trade, this fixed, irrevocable and now historic rate offers no second-chance to price the Euro again. To inflate (i.e. devalue) its way out of this fiscal crisis, Greece only has the nuclear monetary option of quitting the Euro. And just as in 1931 London, the forecasts for what will come after – a "major disaster" indeed – are dire.

Civil protests had long since rattled Great Britain; the General Strike and its flirtation with revolution came within 12 months of the 1925 return to gold. British civil servants then fretted over ten, twenty, even fifty per cent overnight hikes in the cost of living. But the loss of credibility – and even with Sterling dropping from $4.86 to $3.25 between mid-Sept. and end-Dec. 1931 – never quite destroyed Britain’s credit. Because the entire British Empire also went off gold together, taking nearly one-quarter of the world’s land mass and population with them. London thus remained the centre of world finance, including the global Gold Bullion trade, regardless.

Quitting Euroland, on the other hand, would leave Greece – or Spain, Ireland or Portugal, or all of them together – horribly alone. Gold Standard historian and former IMF advisor Barry Eichengreen posited an Italian exit back in late-2007. Only the names have been changed:

"The very motivation for leaving would be to change the parity [between Greece's new domestic currency and the now-neighboring Euro]…Market participants would be aware of this fact. Households and firms would shift their deposits to other Euro-area banks. A system-wide bank run would follow. Investors anticipating that their claims on the [Greek] government would be redenominated into [the Euro's devalued replacement] would shift into claims on other Euro-area governments, leading to a bond-market crisis…

"It would be unlikely that the ECB would provide extensive lender-of-last-resort support. And if the government was already in a weak fiscal position, it would not be able to borrow to bail out the banks and buy back its debt."

In short, "This would be the mother of all financial crises," guesses Eichengreen. But no matter, he says; it can’t happen. "The decision to join…is effectively irreversible. Exit is effectively impossible."

How come? "The insurmountable obstacle to exit is neither economic nor political, but procedural," says the professor. Short of a coup, revolution or state failure, you have to agree.

First, all contracts – both domestic and cross-border – would either be void (which again means revolution, state failure, coup or all three), or they’d be subject to a sweeping redenomination law. That would require long, detailed, co-operative discussion, both internally and with governments, business and private individuals across the European Union and beyond. So no dice there, then.

Then there’s the logistical nightmare of re-pricing all goods and services, replacing all those vending machines, and reprogramming all Greece’s bank and till systems – a fun project when Euro accession approached, but hardly a laugh as hyperinflation looms. So again, we’re back to revolution…if not a coup or failed state…and you don’t need to be Helmut Kohl or Jacques Chirac to wince at the irony of Europe’s greatest unifying dream (to date) ending with chaos and bloodshed west of the Balkans.

Greece’s problem, therefore, really is "a Eurozone problem" as finance minister George Papaconstantinou has repeated throughout this crisis. Since it cannot devalue or exit, something else has to give. And that something, we guess, is the Euro – or rather, its historical backing of post-war German-style strength, built on the living memory of Weimar inflation and so coveted by those very Eurozone states now making it untenable.

"The Europeans would be silly to let this blow up," says Credit Suisse’s head of interest-rate strategy, speaking to Bloomberg. "The ECB will have to be relatively dovish and relent a bit on their plan to withdraw [banking] liquidity."

Relenting "a bit" is precisely what the Euro was supposed to avoid, however, and precisely what got it into this mess. Sticking to the Growth & Stability Pact’s budget deficit rules may (or may not) have kept the Euro’s 16 members aligned economically (a balance of payments limit would have helped, too) but it’s too late now to pretend 3% and 60% hold more than totemic value. The ECB’s half-trillion in ultra-cheap liquidity, meantime, went against all the European Central Bank claimed to stand for when it opened in 1998, setting the aim – long since denied and disdained – of keeping money-supply growth at 4.5% per year for fear of the price-inflation or deflationary collapse that might otherwise follow.

"Public commitment", "inflation vigilance", "price stability"…these are just words. The Eurozone union is fact. And while promises, like stability pacts – or the commitment to honor a gold-exchange at a certain weight of metal – can be over-looked, the world’s most heavily issued money cannot.

Not by those 317 million people for whom it’s now their domestic currency. Right now, it would seem their only-possible currency, too – whether strong, weak, or devalued to all-time record lows against gold, as it has been already in 2010.

Got Euros to exchange for Gold…? Want out of Sterling or Dollars as well? Make Buying Gold simple, secure and cost-effective like nowhere else by using BullionVault today…

Source:1931 for the Euro, Part II

Spinning the IMF Gold Sales

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

India bought 200 tonnes of IMF gold. Now the Fund is selling another 191.3 tonnes…

WHEN INDIA
announced its purchase of 200 tonnes of IMF gold in November, it added a statement that it might buy more of the International Monetary Fund’s gold as well, writes Julian Phillips at Gold Forecaster.

This implied that it was limited by the IMF to the 200 tonnes it bought. But the IMF never said that. Rather it said it would announce the sale of any other portion of their gold to the public.

It has been several months since another sale took place, leaving the IMF with 191.3 tonnes of the 403 tonnes slated for sale still up for grabs. Now with last week’s announcement, we are given the impression that central banks have not come forward to buy and are therefore not buyers.

Talk about "spin"!

China for sure would not buy if an announcement were to be made. It would rather Buy Gold once it had been sold in the open market, for it could then buy through its chosen bullion bank or bullion banks – and do so "under the radar". In fairness to the IMF, they have said they are open to central banks buying direct from them still, and will announce such sales. But you must realize that any further sales through the ‘open’ market will be done anonymously. This levels the playing field. However, all we will now hear is the completion of such sales.

If the IMF decides to sell 4 tonnes a week, we will hear about it through the ECB website in tonnage terms but with no further details. Will we hear of a 100 tonne sale done this way? Unlikely, but possible!

The gold market first reacted by fearing a dumping of this amount of gold, but once it gathered itself together, the market realized that the IMF’s open-market sales could be bullish for the Gold Price.

After all, 191 tonnes is an amount that the gold market does not see often, so a big buyer in the wings, finding that much gold for one price, might well come and bid for it. But will the IMF offer the amount to the market in one go or drip feed it? No one knows. They can now play the game as they choose.

If the IMF wants to sell its gold quickly, it is incumbent upon the Fund to accept a bid for the entire amount. But rarely is life so straightforward, these days. The reality is that there is the demand for such amounts in one sale. But the real question is, "Do the IMF want to sell it in one go?"

Looking to Buy Gold at live market prices? Sidestep the middleman and go to the wholesale market direct – starting with 1 gram of free gold right now – only at BullionVault

Source:Spinning the IMF Gold Sales