Posts Tagged ‘Fox News’

Gold Gets All Political

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

Vote for gold, not the distraction of Glenn Beck & Goldline vs. Congressman Weiner…

GOLD
is already the political of asset classes. So it was certain to happen at some point in this multi-year – if not multi-decade – bull run.

Because we all have a choice – "a choice between the natural stability of Gold and the honesty and intelligence of the members of government," as the playwright and early Socialist George Bernard Shaw put it.

"With all due respect for those gentlemen, I advise you, as long as the capitalist system lasts, [to] vote for Gold."

The weary humor is Shaw’s; the italics are ours. Because a little over a century later, gold is performing as advertised…surging to untold records as politicians worldwide refuse to be honest or intelligent about anything much. But capitalism – or at least, the right to property, which is where it begins – needs to persist for gold’s "natural stability" to retain any use.

Hold that thought as we take a trip to the circus…

"Goldline formed an unholy alliance with conservative pundits to drive a false narrative," alleges Anthony D.Weiner, Congressman for New York’s 9th district, in his extraordinary attack on Fox News and the major US coin dealer recommended by the apparently $32 million-per-year Glenn Beck.

Never mind that, according to Weiner’s own website, he was last seen on the House floor asserting that "The Republican Party is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the insurance industry." This isn’t about Weiner’s tabloid metaphors. It’s about the "false narrative" allegedly put about by Beck – and thus Goldline, according to Brooklyn and Queens’ man in Washington – to sell gold at horrible mark-ups by "playing off public fears" of inflation.

"On numerous occasions, Glenn Beck has dedicated entire segments of his program to explaining why the US money supply is destined for hyperinflation with Barack Obama as president. He will often promote the purchase of gold as the only safe investment alternative for consumers who want to safeguard their livelihoods. When the show then cuts to commercial break, viewers are treated to an advertisement from Goldline…"

Gasp! Horror! There’s a salesman on American TV…!

Whatever the rights or wrongs of one self-promoting showman attacking another in a formal presentation stamped "House of Representatives", it was only a matter of time before the rabid anti-rabid-right of rabid US politics took issue with Beck’s foaming-mouth advertorials. And luckily for the watching media, the sideshow makes a great distraction – "Look! Punch and Judy!" – from the very live, very threatening politicization of all investment decisions.

Australia’s absurd "super profits" tax of 40% on mining firms, for instance, looks horribly contagious, even if it’s the axiom of George Bernard Shaw’s tip. Because if the world’s second most expensive cost-per-ounce gold producers can bear it, why not lower-cost regions as well…?

The need to grab cash from captive producers is universal, and unlike hedge funds, mining projects can’t relocate. Claimed as some kind of primeval patrimony by tax-hungry politicians – even pasty Anglo-Saxons down under, like prime minister Kevin Rudd – the last decade’s surge in raw material prices clearly invites "resource nationalism". Indeed, it’s a major risk worldwide reckons Evy Hambro, son of British gold-mining magnate and banking heir Peter, and manager of BlackRock’s $14bn World Mining Fund.

Yes, Hambro’s got vested interests here, just like Glenn Beck. But does that make him a shill, merely voicing a view to extend his own income…?

"Equities aren’t the only source of revenue governments will seek to tap," writes Alen Mattich in his Wall Street Journal blog. "Any assets that can be valued relatively easily – and any income flows, whatever their source, that governments can get their hands on – will be a temptation for the taxman.

"Is, say, a levy on gold – everybody’s favorite safe haven – impossible?"

Mattich says a globally-agreed sales tax on Gold could prevent money from slipping through government hands. Which would be true, if only he didn’t underestimate London’s grasp on global gold trading. VAT on gold won’t make a comeback here any time soon. Not in the wholesale bullion market. Not with China now the world’s largest gold-mining nation, fifth largest central-bank holder, and second-largest consumer market. The UK has none of those things. It owns the gold market, and thus taxes the trading revenues earned in London, by historical convenience alone. So while the new Lib-Con coalition looks set to be as dishonest and stupid as every other government since George Bernard Shaw and before, it’s unlikely to be quite that unintelligent just yet. Surely.

More broadly, however, a special tax on private gold-owners’ gains may soon appeal pretty much everywhere. Long-time holders were early and right in spotting the financial crisis ahead – and nobody likes a smart-arse, remember. Even more recent buyers are also showing notable gains, and most notably against the fast-sickening Euro, too. So while "It was probably a mistake to allow gold to rise so high," as Paul Volcker, chairman of the Federal Reserve when gold peaked at $850 an ounce in 1980, once famously said, it’s German and Greek politicians who must now be wondering why Europe’s central-bank gold sales ended without having a gold tax ready and waiting to keep milking the metal.

Yes, the honest and intelligent thing would be to make like Volcker and raise interest rates. Defending the value – and thus use – of money would ensure the vital liquidity it brings to life’s everyday choices. Seeking to devalue it instead, however, government will increasingly lose votes to gold. Expecting some kind of political fight-back is only prudent. But what?

Vietnam’s 2008 ban on gold imports merely spurred smuggling, plus new record highs in domestic gold prices. India’s increased gold tariffs early this year gave the same boost to Nepalese smugglers, too. Most idiotically, a tax-grab was attempted – but foiled – in Europe last summer, when Rome turned on the Bank of Italy’s national gold hoard!

Worded to catch all non-industrial holdings, but solely aimed at the central-bank vaults, Silvio Berlusconi’s "Anti-Crisis" Gold Law met unflinching opposition from both the Banca’s chief, Mario Draghi, and his big bruising friends up in Frankfurt at the European Central Bank. Now the ECB is just one U-turn away, however, from printing money to finance government debt, making the current record-high Gold Prices sharply ironic, not to say prophetic. The Bank of Italy, meantime, has joined France and Germany in ignoring losses on those government bonds held by commercial banks – losses that would otherwise force them to raise cash to boost their capital reserves. And Germany has broken ranks with the rest of Europe…enforcing new "short selling" bans on financial stocks, and extending it verboten to "speculate" against Eurozone debt inside Deutschland’s borders.

Things are growing quietly desperate, in short. Your personal finances are set to become very political, not least if you have something to lose. Sorry, something to share. For the good of the state, you understand. Sorry, for the good of the country…if not the world.

Buying Gold today…? "If there’s an easier way, I’ve yet to find it," says one BullionVault user…

Source:Gold Gets All Political

All You Need is Money

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Why more money actually makes poor people poorer…

I AM HAPPY TO
note that the Tea Party, which appeals to me personally, is gaining traction and power, which adds more political overtones to my life and gets me, a shameful Republican, away from the loathsome Republicans (except Ron Paul), who have acted almost as despicably as the Democrats, writes the Mogambo Guru from his Tampa Bay hide-out for the Daily Reckoning.

I cheerfully denounce them all with a snotty, disrespectful tone in my voice and a condescending sneer on my lips – also an indicator of disrespect – because I am a guy who has spent a lifetime reading about what happens when governments try this "increasing the money supply" crapola that, since the 1960s, the Democrats made into a political mainstay and the Republicans went "grudgingly" along with it, and I am, in a word, horrified and disgusted.

The truth is that I am now continuing to write, as after writing that last horrific sentence about "increase the money supply", I took the rest of the morning off to think about it, hopefully to calm my shattered nerves. Now I am back at work after discovering that I am more, much more than horrified, and instead am in a Raging Mogambo Snit (RMS) because, according to Fox News, "Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the influential Finance Committee" said that the "overhaul" of the healthcare system was "an ‘income shift’ to help the poor", which is not what I am angry about because it’s exactly true, else why do it?

So you can’t fault him for saying what is true! Hahaha!

However, I can fault Senator Baucus for just being a typical laughable-yet-loathsome modern Democrat, entirely emblematic as he is of the egotistical big-hearted people who love, and live to love, and love to live to love, and who think that the Beatles were right when they sang "All you need is love", and use their arrogant "more-compassionate-than-thou" conceit as a bloody bludgeon to beat into submission common sense, economics, the entire history of fiat currencies, and the eternal problem of what to do with the poor people, the crippled people, and the old people.

The part that really makes me despise Democrats slightly more than I despise Republicans is that Democrats ridiculously try to "help" the poor by tearing down the only system that has been shown to actually help the poor; namely, supplying them with jobs and keeping consumer prices from rising. Indeed – and wonderfully! – prices gently come down under this system, so that the poor have a rising standard of living because their money buys more.

"And what could such a wonderful system be?" you ask, unable to believe your ears. I reply, "It’s what you automatically get from a system of free enterprise powered by a stable money supply. It works like magic! It always has! It always will!"

Yet instead, the Federal Reserve will be forced to create so Monstrously Much Money (MMM) to finance a cancerously enlarging government to drown us in total debt, and thus continuously, massively enlarge the monetary base, which must make prices rise and rise continuously, prices which the poor can’t afford to pay and which makes them poorer, which makes Congress borrow and spend more money, which makes the money supply rise and rise, with prices always rising and rising as the monetary base gets larger and larger, round and around, whirling and twirling, spinning, spinning, spinning until you fall to the ground, crying out, dramatically:

"Noooooo! More money only creates, paradoxically, more poor working people to add to the huge existing population of poor people because wage increases always lag price increases!"

Senator Baucus does not acknowledge my scorn or compliment me on my fine acting performance, and I hope everyone noticed how he would not meet my gaze, either, and instead lamely talks about "income mal-distribution" by saying that "Wages have not kept up with increased income of the highest income in America", like this is some kind of news to him or something.

To this I say, "Hahahaboohoohoohahahaboohoohaboohaboohaha!" which shows that I am laughing and crying, and then laughing, and then crying, and then laughing, and then crying while laughing at the sheer idiocy of it, which proves that it must be idiotic for me to be laughing that way, QED.

Then, to show that he is a true Democrat, he says, "This legislation will have the effect of addressing the mal-distribution of income in America", although he did not elaborate by saying, "by taking it away from somebody richer and giving it to someone poorer" and he did not say, "it will be paid for with fiat money created by the Federal Reserve so that Congress can borrow and spend it" and he did not say, "this unprecedented avalanche of new money will monstrously drive up prices paid by the poor, making them much, much poorer and angrier" but he could have and he should have.

Apparently, though, Senator Baucus is kind of stupid, as he does not understand that when a government deficit-spends, it does so by borrowing the money, but since the poor don’t have any money to loan to the government, the rich end up borrowing the money to loan to the government, whereupon the rich, over time, get all their money back, plus interest, making them richer, while, unfortunately, the poor get poorer because prices have risen.

All of these things he could have said, and he might as well have said, as it is all there in black and white at Mises.org, or it should be, and might well be!

And while neither he nor Mises.org said to Buy Gold, silver and oil as protection against this sheer economic idiocy and insanity, they might as well have, and while I cannot imagine either of them saying, "Whee! This investing stuff is easy" I certainly will!

Whee!

How best to Buy Gold and silver today? Start at BullionVault now…

Source:All You Need is Money

Gold Gains 1.5% In First Quarter To $1,114.50/oz (Fox News)

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

Gold Gains 1.5% In First Quarter To $1,114.50/oz

Source:Gold Gains 1.5% In First Quarter To $1,114.50/oz (Fox News)

Gold Ends Lower On Rising Dollar (Fox News)

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Gold Ends Lower On Rising Dollar

Source:Gold Ends Lower On Rising Dollar (Fox News)

Gold Closes Higher As Dollar, Greek Fears Weigh (Fox News)

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Gold Closes Higher As Dollar, Greek Fears Weigh

Source:Gold Closes Higher As Dollar, Greek Fears Weigh (Fox News)