Posts Tagged ‘International Monetary Fund’

Whose Gold Is China Buying?

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Whose gold is China buying? Its own, of course…

THE PRICE OF GOLD
slipped last week, now trading 3.6% off its recent high, writes Dan Denning in his Daily Reckoning Australia.

Old yellow metal is trading a little above $1100 the ounce according to the April futures contract. The sense of urgency over the Greek crisis has eased. And no one thinks China is going to Buy IMF Gold. But why?

Speaking last week at the National People’s Congress, China’s foreign exchange regulator Yi Gant told a press conference that, "currently a few factors limit our ability to increase foreign-exchange investment in gold."

As we wrote in a note this weekend, most analysts immediately took that to mean China would not be a buyer of the 191.3 metric tonnes of gold the International Monetary Fund announced it would sell on February 17th. And if China were out as a major buyer of gold on international markets, speculators reckon that the Gold Price is in for a fall.

Yet as China bought 454.1 tonnes of gold between 2003 and 2009 – the last purchase reported – it didn’t have to go shopping overseas. China can buy its own home-grown gold instead, because for the last three years in a row, it’s been the world’s largest producer. China produced over 300 tonnes of gold for the first time ever in 2009, according to the China Gold Association.

That also means that last year’s domestic gold consumption – from private households alone – exceeded mine supply. Were Chinese authorities buying above ground gold too? The number of producing gold mines in China has fallen from 1200 in 2002 to 700 in 2009. You can see China is scrambling to produce as much gold as fast as it can.

This could be a case of a "Do as I do, not as I say." Why bid up the Gold Price on international markets when you can buy your own domestically produced gold? As a senior People’s Bank of China figure reportedly said:

"China should formulate a long-term plan and constantly and secretly increase its gold holdings…The People’s Bank should try to buy as much gold as possible from China’s annual gold output of almost 300 tons, while the gold needed by industries and residents could be imported."

Look, the case for gold is pretty simple. To paraphrase fund manager David Einhorn, if you believe monetary and fiscal policy across the world are sensible, sell gold and buy Treasuries. If you believe monetary and fiscal policy around the world are bad, sell Treasuries and Buy Gold.

You don’t have to a cult follower or a true believer to profit from that kind of trade. Gold made its biggest move in 1980. It peaked at $850 in early January, but what’s interesting is that 10-year US Treasury yields didn’t peak until more than a year later, hitting around 16% in June of 1981.

The speculators blew the top off the gold market, in other words, well before they were sure Paul Volcker had a lid on inflation. Once it became clear punitive US rates would kill inflation, the gold bull died.

But wait! US rates went up because the Fed was fighting inflation. And it was fighting inflation because…there was inflation! How can we expect gold to rise on higher rates if there’s no inflation to fight? The answer is that the Fed’s quantitative easing program is set to end this month.

Over the last year, the US central bank has spent over $1.25 trillion buying mortgage-backed securities. This has kept ten-year US interest rates low and mortgage credit flowing to the American housing market. The Fed has said that program will end by the end of this month.

What will happen next? Already we’ve seen investors crowding into the short-end of the US Treasury market. Treasury notes with maturities of three-years less are a nice, near-cash, highly-liquid alternative to taking any risks anywhere else. Hence lower short-term US interest rates, driven partly by the Fed and partly by the market.

With the Fed set to end its quantitative easing program, we’d expect market forces to assert themselves in the bond market. You’ll get a steeper yield curve. Without the government gaming the trade, investors are going to price US bonds based on the soundness of US fiscal and monetary policy. In this scenario, we think gold will attract more speculators (although the big ones like George Soros have already positioned themselves for this move).

Meanwhile in Europe, the news that finance ministers have agreed, in principle, to a bailout of Greece, might take a little of the urgency out of the sovereign debt crisis theme. And that, in turn, might drive the Gold Price lower. But all these things are prelude to a bigger crisis. Papering over the insolvency of the Welfare State can only last so long – and we think the dominos will begin to fall in months, not years.

In the meantime, though, the continued de-leveraging of the private sector means even larger public sector deficits. According to flow of funds data released the by the Federal Reserve last week, both US household and businesses reduced debt in 2009. The government added debt.

In fact the Fed data show that US households reduced debt on an annual basis for the first time ever in the history of the data series, going back to 1946. Household debt levels shrunk by 1.7%, with mortgage debt declining by 1.6% and credit card debt declining 4.6%.

It’s obvious at the household level, where the employment picture is awful, that Americans are preparing for less spending and less income growth. They are not borrowing from future earnings to sustain current living standards. The worm has turned.

And you can’t blame businesses for reducing debt by 1.8% either. Why borrow if you’re not going to increase capital spending or employment growth? There’s a political issue here too. You could argue that business investment is cyclical and will go up eventually. But with the US Congress deadlocked over health care legislation (that if passed might be repealed by the next Congress elected in November), there is a lot of uncertainty. You could also call that political risk.

Into the household caution and business uncertainty, the Federal government increased debt by 22.7% in 2009. It was below the 2008 record of 24.2%. But it’s clear that as the private sector deleverages, the government – under the misguided Keynesian assumption that it must support demand – is trying to fill the breech with borrowed money.

This sets the stage for the next episode of the US Dollar crisis. Right now, that may look remote, given the easing of tensions in Europe. But don’t get too complacent. The underlying fundamentals of the Dollar suck. With the Fed’s Quantitative Easing program set to end this month, a veritable monetary Pandora’s Box will be opened. Yes, the Fed could just announce it’s extending its Quantitative Easing program. But what effect would that have on the Dollar? On gold? On oil…?

Buying Gold today? "If there’s an easier way, I’ve yet to find it," says one BullionVault user…

Source:Whose Gold Is China Buying?

China's Gold Investment

Sunday, March 14th, 2010

How can China build its gold reserves if it doesn’t Buy Gold…?

"A FEW FACTORS
limit our ability to increase [our] Gold Investment," said China’s chief foreign exchange manager, Yi Gang, in a speech this week, notes Steve Sjuggerud in his Daily Wealth email.

Western investors have long speculated China will start Buying Gold and selling its hoard of US Dollars at some point. (China’s hoard could be literally trillions of US Dollars.) It would be the first step in a "Doomsday" scenario for the greenback.

Just imagine – China trades in its Dollar reserves for Gold Bullion. The value of the Dollar crashes…and US interest rates soar, as China is no longer willing to buy US government Treasury bonds.

Some investors have said China has a perfect way to do it, available right now. The International Monetary Fund (the IMF) has a near-200-tonne hoard of gold that it wants to unload.

But if China actually used all its Dollar reserves to Buy Physical Gold, it would completely overwhelm the market. It would end up trying to buy about a third of all the gold ever mined in the history of the world. There’s no way it could get all that gold without sending the price to outrageous levels.

It seems Mr. Yi recognizes that. He essentially said gold is too volatile, the historic returns aren’t that great, and any gold buying by China would "certainly" increase Gold Prices.

If Mr. Yi is to be taken at his word, in short, China doesn’t have plans to Buy Gold in the open market. And Mr. Yi’s comments are in line with recent comments from the China Gold Association, who told the China Daily newspaper that it is "not feasible for China to buy the IMF bullion, as any purchase or even intent to do so would trigger market speculation and volatility."

So how would China acquire gold if it doesn’t buy it? This is where it gets interesting…

An official from the China Gold Association told the China Daily that rather than acquiring Gold from the IMF, China would Buy Gold directly by buying gold mines "abroad". Rather than buying physical gold in the open market (where China would be the 800-pound gorilla in the room), China plans to buy future production instead.

If that’s true (and there is some sense to it), then how should you play it? Dennis Gartman reported on this yesterday, in his Gartman Letter:

Perhaps we are to begin owning gold mines rather than Gold Futures or Gold ETFs. We have avoided owning mines for years, preferring the "purer" play of owning gold rather than the mines, for we fear being exposed to poor mine management, or accidents in a mine that might do damage to the equity while gold itself moves higher. But if the Chinese authorities want to own mines, perhaps we have to consider doing so also…

I’ve done more than consider buying Gold Mining companies. In the latest issue of True Wealth, my subscription newsletter, I recommended Buying Gold mines as the best way to have exposure to gold right now.

The reason is simple. This chart sums it up…

Gold is up 70% since the summer of 2006. Meanwhile, gold stocks (as measured by the Gold BUGS Index) have done nothing.

Usually, a 10% move in gold would mean a 20% move in gold stocks. But this relationship broke down in the financial crisis. Now, either the price of gold needs to crash… or the price of gold stocks needs to soar to correct this anomaly.

The timing might be just right. Gold mining stocks are down, and it’s just coming to light that the Chinese authorities could prefer acquiring gold mines – which give the country a permanent supply – over Buying Gold in the open market.

Building your personal gold reserves today? Make it cheap, safe and simple by using BullionVault

Source:China's Gold Investment

China's Gold Investment

Saturday, March 13th, 2010

How can China build its gold reserves if it doesn’t Buy Gold…?

"A FEW FACTORS
limit our ability to increase [our] Gold Investment," said China’s chief foreign exchange manager, Yi Gang, in a speech this week, notes Steve Sjuggerud in his Daily Wealth email.

Western investors have long speculated China will start Buying Gold and selling its hoard of US Dollars at some point. (China’s hoard could be literally trillions of US Dollars.) It would be the first step in a "Doomsday" scenario for the greenback.

Just imagine – China trades in its Dollar reserves for Gold Bullion. The value of the Dollar crashes…and US interest rates soar, as China is no longer willing to buy US government Treasury bonds.

Some investors have said China has a perfect way to do it, available right now. The International Monetary Fund (the IMF) has a near-200-tonne hoard of gold that it wants to unload.

But if China actually used all its Dollar reserves to Buy Physical Gold, it would completely overwhelm the market. It would end up trying to buy about a third of all the gold ever mined in the history of the world. There’s no way it could get all that gold without sending the price to outrageous levels.

It seems Mr. Yi recognizes that. He essentially said gold is too volatile, the historic returns aren’t that great, and any gold buying by China would "certainly" increase Gold Prices.

If Mr. Yi is to be taken at his word, in short, China doesn’t have plans to Buy Gold in the open market. And Mr. Yi’s comments are in line with recent comments from the China Gold Association, who told the China Daily newspaper that it is "not feasible for China to buy the IMF bullion, as any purchase or even intent to do so would trigger market speculation and volatility."

So how would China acquire gold if it doesn’t buy it? This is where it gets interesting…

An official from the China Gold Association told the China Daily that rather than acquiring Gold from the IMF, China would Buy Gold directly by buying gold mines "abroad". Rather than buying physical gold in the open market (where China would be the 800-pound gorilla in the room), China plans to buy future production instead.

If that’s true (and there is some sense to it), then how should you play it? Dennis Gartman reported on this yesterday, in his Gartman Letter:

Perhaps we are to begin owning gold mines rather than Gold Futures or Gold ETFs. We have avoided owning mines for years, preferring the "purer" play of owning gold rather than the mines, for we fear being exposed to poor mine management, or accidents in a mine that might do damage to the equity while gold itself moves higher. But if the Chinese authorities want to own mines, perhaps we have to consider doing so also…

I’ve done more than consider buying Gold Mining companies. In the latest issue of True Wealth, my subscription newsletter, I recommended Buying Gold mines as the best way to have exposure to gold right now.

The reason is simple. This chart sums it up…

Gold is up 70% since the summer of 2006. Meanwhile, gold stocks (as measured by the Gold BUGS Index) have done nothing.

Usually, a 10% move in gold would mean a 20% move in gold stocks. But this relationship broke down in the financial crisis. Now, either the price of gold needs to crash… or the price of gold stocks needs to soar to correct this anomaly.

The timing might be just right. Gold mining stocks are down, and it’s just coming to light that the Chinese authorities could prefer acquiring gold mines – which give the country a permanent supply – over Buying Gold in the open market.

Building your personal gold reserves today? Make it cheap, safe and simple by using BullionVault

Source:China's Gold Investment

China's Gold Investment

Friday, March 12th, 2010

How can China build its gold reserves if it doesn’t Buy Gold…?

"A FEW FACTORS
limit our ability to increase [our] Gold Investment," said China’s chief foreign exchange manager, Yi Gang, in a speech this week, notes Steve Sjuggerud in his Daily Wealth email.

Western investors have long speculated China will start Buying Gold and selling its hoard of US Dollars at some point. (China’s hoard could be literally trillions of US Dollars.) It would be the first step in a "Doomsday" scenario for the greenback.

Just imagine – China trades in its Dollar reserves for Gold Bullion. The value of the Dollar crashes…and US interest rates soar, as China is no longer willing to buy US government Treasury bonds.

Some investors have said China has a perfect way to do it, available right now. The International Monetary Fund (the IMF) has a near-200-tonne hoard of gold that it wants to unload.

But if China actually used all its Dollar reserves to Buy Physical Gold, it would completely overwhelm the market. It would end up trying to buy about a third of all the gold ever mined in the history of the world. There’s no way it could get all that gold without sending the price to outrageous levels.

It seems Mr. Yi recognizes that. He essentially said gold is too volatile, the historic returns aren’t that great, and any gold buying by China would "certainly" increase Gold Prices.

If Mr. Yi is to be taken at his word, in short, China doesn’t have plans to Buy Gold in the open market. And Mr. Yi’s comments are in line with recent comments from the China Gold Association, who told the China Daily newspaper that it is "not feasible for China to buy the IMF bullion, as any purchase or even intent to do so would trigger market speculation and volatility."

So how would China acquire gold if it doesn’t buy it? This is where it gets interesting…

An official from the China Gold Association told the China Daily that rather than acquiring Gold from the IMF, China would Buy Gold directly by buying gold mines "abroad". Rather than buying physical gold in the open market (where China would be the 800-pound gorilla in the room), China plans to buy future production instead.

If that’s true (and there is some sense to it), then how should you play it? Dennis Gartman reported on this yesterday, in his Gartman Letter:

Perhaps we are to begin owning gold mines rather than Gold Futures or Gold ETFs. We have avoided owning mines for years, preferring the "purer" play of owning gold rather than the mines, for we fear being exposed to poor mine management, or accidents in a mine that might do damage to the equity while gold itself moves higher. But if the Chinese authorities want to own mines, perhaps we have to consider doing so also…

I’ve done more than consider buying Gold Mining companies. In the latest issue of True Wealth, my subscription newsletter, I recommended Buying Gold mines as the best way to have exposure to gold right now.

The reason is simple. This chart sums it up…

Gold is up 70% since the summer of 2006. Meanwhile, gold stocks (as measured by the Gold BUGS Index) have done nothing.

Usually, a 10% move in gold would mean a 20% move in gold stocks. But this relationship broke down in the financial crisis. Now, either the price of gold needs to crash… or the price of gold stocks needs to soar to correct this anomaly.

The timing might be just right. Gold mining stocks are down, and it’s just coming to light that the Chinese authorities could prefer acquiring gold mines – which give the country a permanent supply – over Buying Gold in the open market.

Building your personal gold reserves today? Make it cheap, safe and simple by using BullionVault

Source:China's Gold Investment

Gold & the World's No.1 Currency

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

Comparing SDRs with the Dollar in gold, you can see what peeves the Chinese…

LAST WEEK
, the head of the International Monetary Fund, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, suggested the global lending organization might be called upon to offer its 186-nation members an alternative to the US Dollar as a reserve currency, writes Brad Zigler at Hard Assets Investor.

In response to calls by China and Russia to supplant the greenback with special drawing rights – the IMF’s internal accounting unit – Strauss-Kahn said:

"That day has not yet come. But I think it is intellectually healthy to explore these kinds of ideas now."

Special drawing rights were devised by the IMF in 1969 to replace Gold Bullion in large international transactions and to serve as a supplement to central bank reserve positions.

Though freely convertible in IMF transactions, SDRs aren’t a currency. Instead, they’re credits that a nation with a trade deficit can use to settle balance-of-payment debts. Since SDRs are ledger entries, their use eliminates the logistics of shipping Gold Bullion back and forth to settle national accounts.

By value, SDRs represent a trade- and reserve-weighted basket of currencies, including the US Dollar, the Euro, the Japanese Yen and the Pound Sterling. The SDR basket’s makeup is determined every five years by the IMF executive board and is due for its next revamp later this year. Currently, the SDR basket is weighted as:

  • US Dollar: 41.1%
  • Euro: 36.1%
  • Japanese Yen: 13.5%
  • British Pound: 8.9%

The IMF recently increased the SDR float to 204.1 billion, now worth about $313.2 billion.

This year’s reset of SDRs is bound to reflect ongoing shifts in central bank reserves positions. In particular, the IMF executive board will consider rejiggering the SDR to reflect a diminution in the Dollar’s heft.

The US Dollar is the world’s most widely held reserve currency, making up just under two-thirds (10-year weighted average: 65.2%) of central bank holdings worldwide. The currency’s ubiquity, however, has been chipped away with increasing velocity over the past decade. As central banks have sought to diversify their reserve positions, Dollar concentrations have declined at an average annual rate of 92 basis points (0.92%) since 1999.

The primary beneficiary of world currency realignment has been the Euro, which now comprises a quarter (a weighted average of 25.3%) of global reserve allocations. Since the Euro’s introduction in 1999, allocations have grown at a 99 basis point compound annual rate.

At a distant third is the British Pound Sterling (weighted average: 3.8% of allocated reserves), once the world’s most heavily banked currency. Sterling allocations, though relatively small, have been growing along with the diversification trend. Central banks’ holdings of British currency have grown an average 14 basis points a year.

Commitments to the Japanese yen, however, have taken a downward trajectory. With allocations averaging 3.7%, the Yen’s reserve position has been falling at a 32 basis point annual rate.

One of the "intellectually healthy" notions for diversifying away from the greenback was floated last year by the governor of the People’s Bank of China, who argued for enlarging the SDR basket to include more currencies and establishing a settlement system that would make SDRs tradable outside of the IMF’s books.

Indeed, the trend among central banks is to hold increasingly large positions in currencies that the IMF currently buckets as "other". To be sure, some central bank holdings (weighted average: 18 basis points) are still maintained in Swiss Francs, but that position is shrinking by a basis point a year. Yet the "other" category is growing at virtually the same pace as the British Pound allocation, and now represents nearly 3% of global reserve commitments.

It’s easy to see why the Chinese have an axe to grind. The People’s Republic holds more than $2 trillion in Dollar assets accrued through years of Treasury purchases and exporting. The greenback’s hegemony as a reserve currency makes it easier for the US to run high trade deficits, a consequence of debt-financed consumerism and a low savings rate. American budget deficits put Chinese Dollar-based investments at risk.

But using the current iteration of SDRs as a substitute for Dollars really wouldn’t offer much risk reduction. Why? Reduce the SDR and the Dollar to Gold Bullion terms, and you’ll see they’re highly correlated with each other

For most of the five years since the last SDR reset, in fact, the IMF accounting unit was a virtual clone of the Dollar. Their rolling 30-day correlation (when priced in Gold Bullion) has averaged 98.6% since February 2005…as near to perfect as could possibly matter.

Clearly, a revision of the SDR basket is needed, but doing so raises new questions.

First of all, the Euro’s correlation to SDRs, though lower than the Dollar’s, isn’t small. The currency’s 30-day correlation to the IMF unit has averaged 93.4% over the past five years. Thus, pushing the Euro into a dominant position in the basket would run the risk of replacing one problem for another of virtually equal proportions.

One also has to consider the strains on the Euro as weaknesses in Irish and Greek economies threaten to scuttle the currency. So what about adding additional "other" currencies to the basket?

The truly representative choices are slim. The Chinese Yuan can’t be used until it becomes freely convertible on the world’s currency markets. And the Chinese currency’s value is only gradually – very gradually – being unwound from the Dollar. Full convertibility isn’t likely until trade barriers are lowered and access to Chinese markets is enhanced. That requires political change in Beijing, something not easily wrought.

Even if an optimal mix of other currencies could be found, attempting to float the SDR as a currency would introduce another set of risks and challenges. There’s no banking infrastructure in place for trading SDRs. Getting SDRs into worldwide circulation among private parties and businesses would be a headache exponentially more painful than the launch of the Euro.

More important, the use of SDRs would require management by a "super" central bank, a potential insult to national sovereignty. The Euro failed to establish hegemony in Great Britain over this very issue a decade ago. The hue and cry in the United States over "giving away" reserves to the IMF or another entity would likely be even louder.

While the IMF might find it intellectually stimulating to consider a top-down approach to finding an alternative to the Dollar as a reserve currency, changes are much more likely to come incrementally and be market driven.

That is, unless we convene another meeting at Bretton Woods to decide a new global currency order.

Looking to Buy Gold today? Make it simple, secure and cost-effective by using BullionVault

Source:Gold & the World's No.1 Currency